RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03402
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her retirement points be recalculated due to her return to
active duty status.
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
There is a discrepancy in the number of service years, months,
and days she received credit for on her final National Guard
Bureau (NGB) Form 22, Report of Separation and Record of
Service, in items 10a-10e.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 5 Mar 04, the applicant entered the Air National Guard.
On 28 Feb 13, the applicant was transferred to USAF Reserve
Retired List and was credited with 21 years, 5 months, 13 days
service for retired pay purposes.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are
contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of
primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C.
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
ARPC/DPTT recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of
an error in the applicants record. After careful review of her
record of service, DPTT found items 10a-10e of the NGB Form 22
are correct. The record of service on her NGB Form 22 matches
the time shown on the calculator used to compute service time.
Her enlistment date was verified by the DD Form 4,
Enlistment/Reenlistment Document Armed Forces of the United
States, and her prior active service times was verified by a
Points Credit Summary. All rows with an FR code reflect prior
active service. Item 10e is the only item missing on the
service calculation, but is captured on the Points Credit
Summary under satisfactory service.
The complete DPTT evaluation is at Exhibit C.
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 1 Dec 14 for review and comment within 30 days
(Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by
this office.
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took
notice of the applicants complete submission, including copies
of special duty orders, in judging the merits of the case;
however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air
Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale
as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the
victim of an error of injustice. Therefore, in the absence of
evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting
the requested relief.
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
The following documentary evidence pertaining AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2014-03402 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 11 Aug 14, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Memorandum, ARPC/DPTT, dated 11 Sep 14.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 1 Dec 14. AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03156
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03156 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She receive federal service credit for employment at Fort Benjamin Harrison, IN (1967 to 1969), the Veterans Affairs Hospital in Cleveland, OH (1971 to 1975), and the Equal Opportunity Commission (1976 to 1977). With regards to the applicants request to confirm her retirement date, her retirement date is 7 Dec 05;...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05455
On 26 Oct 04, the applicant was selected for promotion to the Reserve grade of major (O-4) with a date of rank and promotion effective date of 1 Oct 98. On 10 Apr 06, as a result of the applicants request before the AFBCMR (AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2004-03564) to restore lost points, lost pay, compensation for lost promotion opportunities, retirement consideration, correct his DD Form 214, and correct his reserve status after separation from the Regular Air Force, a directive was published...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01764
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01764 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be credited with 20 years of satisfactory service and entitled to a Reserve retirement. He was advised that he did not receive point credit towards retirement from Apr 88 Dec 89; however, he has a special order which shows he was present 100 percent of the time in 1989. We took notice of the applicants...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03292
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTT recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice which would warrant granting relief. In order to give him additional service time for the excess time he spent in ISLRS, the record would have to be changed to create a break in service after his...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01698
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01698 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He should be reimbursed for any charges he incurred for RCSBP because the ARPC Form 123, RCSBP Election Certificate, showing that he opted out of the RCSBP was submitted within the required 90-day time period prescribed by Title 10 USC, subsection 1448 (a) (2) (B). A complete copy of...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00793
On 25 Aug 1994, the decedent and the applicant divorced. If the documents were provided within the required timeframe, DPTT would have been unable to update the member's RCSBP election due to the member not electing to participate in the Plan when eligible. _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In further support of her request, the applicant provides two letters.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00339
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00339 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: All of his Special Orders covering the period Jun 08 through Sep 10 be changed so Block 1 Authority reflects Title 32 United States Code (USC) §502(f)(2), instead of Title 32 USC §504/505. The applicant has not provided sufficient documentation to establish that the orders he is requesting be changed were issued...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02836
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02836 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. The applicant requested an extension to her MSD to allow her the opportunity to complete 20 years of satisfactory service for retirement. In this respect, we note the applicant timely requested an extension of her 31 Dec 12 MSD in Mar 12;...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03487
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03487 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be credited with a satisfactory year of Reserve service for the retention/retirement (R/R) year 17 Jan 11 to 16 Jan 12. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is included at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04037
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04037 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS: His mandatory separation date (MSD) be adjusted to account for the time he was discharged from the Air Force and unable to serve in the Air Force Reserve. If his service to the military had been continuous during this entire period he would agree that...